When I hit the dictionary, I get: - forbid, especially by law. - denounce or condemn.
Now forbid *could* include IMPOSSIBLE as well as ILLEGAL, but my reading is that it's more sensible to count it as "illegal" only, as the law (in common definition of law used above) can't actually make things impossible. I just ate lunch. (1) Was it an action? I think so, I mean, it was something I did, by choice. (2) is it regulated? not that I can find. (3) could Agoran law ever make it illegal? Sure, in principle Agoran law could apply a punishment to me for eating lunch, (4) could Agoran law ever make it impossible? No. No matter what is written in the ruleset, those words could not actually stop me from eating lunch. Now, on to ice cream. On Sun, 28 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > Aaah. I think we have two "proscribes" then: > -Morally condemn: "Yeah you can do it, but it is punishable" > -Mechanically impossible: "You can't be a Player and a non-Player at the same > time" > > I tend to think of everything in sheer mechanics, I didn't realize the > "moral" proscribe. I think it would mean more the "moral" proscribe then, > would make sense. > > Thank you for the input and I'm sorry for submiting/withdrawing so many CFJs, > I'm just using them to try to learn more about what everything means but then > I get help from other peeps and they > get cleared out and I'm grateful for that. > > I withdraw my most recent CFJ. > >
