I definitely don’t like this CFJ model. Maybe we could implement CFJs by support past 5. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On May 26, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:52 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I've pondered a few ideas: > > 1. Requiring support to call a CFJ. > > > Currently max CFJs per week per player is 5. > > What if, for each CFJ you need N support, where N is the number of other CFJs > you have made in the prior week. > > > 2. Allowing the Arbitor to make a first-cut "DISMISS this one - try again but > less messy and label Caller's Arguments". > > > This just seems reasonable overall. Still wastes a players CFJ usage, but > doesn't put much work on a judge, so it doesn't clog the pipes. >
