How attached is everyone to the current rule numbering scheme? I’ve started 
applying proposals on git branches as they are distributed (so I can just merge 
them when resolution rolls around), but I realized that this system will not 
work if I have to assign sequential ID numbers, as I will not know which 
proposals will succeed at the time of distribution. Would people mind having 
holes in the rule numbers due to failed proposals?

Alternatively, because I don’t believe the ruleset specifies that ID numbers 
must be integers, I might use start numbering new rules as “7903.1” for the 
first rule created by Proposal 7903.

Gaelan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to