On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 06:17 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > The reason for this is that while I consider this CFJ a totally legit > bypass to the finger-pointing system, I don't find myself capable of > actually formally submitting the judgement on such a high-profile conflict > out of simple cowardice, and I'd prefer for a different Judge to do it > instead. > > I pledge to not submit Judgement on CFJ 3509.
Unfortunately, I don't think there's anything I can do about this until the week is up. I've already been considering proposing a method of allowing a change of judge with consent from the existing judge and the new judge. Perhaps this makes it a little more urgent. -- ais523
