On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > While any individual non-player person can not begin as options, the class of > non-player persons who have become options by announcement is a valid option > from the beginning, it just begins empty.
In recent context, "announced" non-players came across *to me* as past-tense; in other words, that you were saying everyone who had announced in the previous attempt was a valid vote. Now, sometimes I read things 100% wrong, so I'll take advice from others reading that; if most of you took it as a currently-empty (but forward-looking) set, I'm happy to withdraw the CFJ because that's on me. If it's a split opinion, it's probably too ambiguous to clearly indicate the options :). -G.
