The ability to intend to do a thing on someone's behalf is entirely
separate from the ability to do it. So even if that was the intended
procedure, nothing in the power enables declaration of intent on
CuddleBeam's behalf.


On 05/22/17 13:40, Quazie wrote:
> If nichdel believes it's unclear that the 24 hour notice was implied
> by the fact that it was changing a power, is that unclear enough to
> actually make it ineffective?
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:36 AM Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com
> <mailto:nich...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On 05/22/17 12:44, CuddleBeam wrote:
>>
>>     Powers: Any Agent may add additional characters to the text content of 
>> the Powers of this agency as long as such changes keep these Powers 
>> functionally synonymous to the Powers that this agency had at its creation.
>>
>     This power is ineffective. The powers of the agency are a
>     property, and can only be amended with notice.
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to