I, unfortunately, can not CFJ on it this week, but I will on Monday.

----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:

> Interesting.
>
> Your message <CAK-5aj_Vf=nLrCkevyPeyE=f=RbvLNB1hJar096n_eXTJGiLog@
> mail.gmail.com> appears to spend the Shinies, and was correctly sent to
> the public forum. Stripping off the public forum mail cruft, it reads:
>
> I hereby pay 4 shinies to pend this proposal.
>
>
> I’m not sure whether the Secretary’s report or the Distributor’s is in
> error.
>
> In any case, it’s probably irrelevant now. That payment appeared in a
> report that has since been ratified, dated May 7th. More than the 7 days
> generally allowed for timely
> <https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/#Rule1023> notice has elapsed.
>
> I think it’s unfair that you should lose your shinies through the action
> of one office, and yet fail to gain the intended results through the action
> of another office, and invite you to open an appropriate CFJ if you can
> think of one, but I think I have to deny this claim of error, and do so.
>
> -o
>
> On May 19, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> TTttPF
>
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> If this is the case then there was an error in the last report of the
>> office tracking shinies, because I was charged the pending fee. Anyways,I
>> submit the following proposal:
>>
>>  {{{
>>  Title: Agora's To-Do List (v2/ov1)
>>  Adoption index: 1.0
>>  Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>
>>  Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY without two
>> objection
>>  add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of
>>  Shinies associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set
>>  of requirements for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by
>>  the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on the to-do list and
>>  claim the specified number of Shinies associated with it by notifying
>>  the Lister of their completion of the task. If the Lister agrees with
>>  the claimee, the Lister shall without two objection pay the claimee the
>> specified number of
>>  Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement regarding completion shall be
>>  resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been completed, the Lister shall
>>  remove it from the to-do list."
>>
>>  Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister
>>  is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of
>>  Agora.
>>
>>  The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran
>>  to-do list and any recent events thereof."
>>  }}}
>>
>> ----
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Sprocklem S <sprock...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I judge CFJ 3479 FALSE.
>>>
>>> Judges arguments:
>>>
>>> I'm inclined to agree that “formatting errors” is not an objective
>>> criteria. Additionally, even if it weren't too ambiguous, it seems like
>>> it would set a bad precedent to allow such difficult to determine
>>> conditionals. It's a lot easier just to have people just resubmit the
>>> proposal if a (formatting) error is found.
>>>
>>>
>>> Since the context is lacking in the CFJ itself, I have included it below.
>>>
>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus called the CFJ:
>>> > Agora's To-Do List is a proposal that was in the proposal pool and has
>>> > been pended.
>>>
>>> This was caused by objections raised by Aris about the validity of the
>>> conditional clause of the submission:
>>> > "Formatting errors" is highly ambiguous. Unless you can clarify it
>>> > down to something easily checkable, I'm going to count that statement
>>> > as void.
>>>
>>> The relevant text of PSS's submission is duplicated below:
>>> > I submit the following proposal if it has no formatting errors and its
>>> > passage would create two new rules:
>>> >
>>> > {{{
>>> > Title: Agora's To-Do List
>>> > Adoption index: 1.0
>>> > Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> >
>>> > Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY with 1
>>> > support add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of
>>> > Shinies associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set
>>> > of requirements for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by
>>> > the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on the to-do list and
>>> > claim the specified number of Shinies associated with it by notifying
>>> > the Lister of their completion of the task. If the Lister agrees with
>>> > the claimee, the Lister shall pay the claimee the specified number of
>>> > Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement regarding completion shall be
>>> > resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been completed, the Lister shall
>>> > remove it from the to-do list."
>>> >
>>> > Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister
>>> > is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of
>>> > Agora.
>>> >
>>> > The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran
>>> > to-do list and any recent events thereof."
>>> > }}}
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sprocklem
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to