I, unfortunately, can not CFJ on it this week, but I will on Monday. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > Interesting. > > Your message <CAK-5aj_Vf=nLrCkevyPeyE=f=RbvLNB1hJar096n_eXTJGiLog@ > mail.gmail.com> appears to spend the Shinies, and was correctly sent to > the public forum. Stripping off the public forum mail cruft, it reads: > > I hereby pay 4 shinies to pend this proposal. > > > I’m not sure whether the Secretary’s report or the Distributor’s is in > error. > > In any case, it’s probably irrelevant now. That payment appeared in a > report that has since been ratified, dated May 7th. More than the 7 days > generally allowed for timely > <https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/#Rule1023> notice has elapsed. > > I think it’s unfair that you should lose your shinies through the action > of one office, and yet fail to gain the intended results through the action > of another office, and invite you to open an appropriate CFJ if you can > think of one, but I think I have to deny this claim of error, and do so. > > -o > > On May 19, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > TTttPF > > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> If this is the case then there was an error in the last report of the >> office tracking shinies, because I was charged the pending fee. Anyways,I >> submit the following proposal: >> >> {{{ >> Title: Agora's To-Do List (v2/ov1) >> Adoption index: 1.0 >> Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> >> Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY without two >> objection >> add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of >> Shinies associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set >> of requirements for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by >> the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on the to-do list and >> claim the specified number of Shinies associated with it by notifying >> the Lister of their completion of the task. If the Lister agrees with >> the claimee, the Lister shall without two objection pay the claimee the >> specified number of >> Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement regarding completion shall be >> resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been completed, the Lister shall >> remove it from the to-do list." >> >> Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister >> is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of >> Agora. >> >> The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran >> to-do list and any recent events thereof." >> }}} >> >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Sprocklem S <sprock...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I judge CFJ 3479 FALSE. >>> >>> Judges arguments: >>> >>> I'm inclined to agree that “formatting errors” is not an objective >>> criteria. Additionally, even if it weren't too ambiguous, it seems like >>> it would set a bad precedent to allow such difficult to determine >>> conditionals. It's a lot easier just to have people just resubmit the >>> proposal if a (formatting) error is found. >>> >>> >>> Since the context is lacking in the CFJ itself, I have included it below. >>> >>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus called the CFJ: >>> > Agora's To-Do List is a proposal that was in the proposal pool and has >>> > been pended. >>> >>> This was caused by objections raised by Aris about the validity of the >>> conditional clause of the submission: >>> > "Formatting errors" is highly ambiguous. Unless you can clarify it >>> > down to something easily checkable, I'm going to count that statement >>> > as void. >>> >>> The relevant text of PSS's submission is duplicated below: >>> > I submit the following proposal if it has no formatting errors and its >>> > passage would create two new rules: >>> > >>> > {{{ >>> > Title: Agora's To-Do List >>> > Adoption index: 1.0 >>> > Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> > >>> > Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY with 1 >>> > support add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of >>> > Shinies associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set >>> > of requirements for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by >>> > the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on the to-do list and >>> > claim the specified number of Shinies associated with it by notifying >>> > the Lister of their completion of the task. If the Lister agrees with >>> > the claimee, the Lister shall pay the claimee the specified number of >>> > Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement regarding completion shall be >>> > resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been completed, the Lister shall >>> > remove it from the to-do list." >>> > >>> > Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister >>> > is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of >>> > Agora. >>> > >>> > The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran >>> > to-do list and any recent events thereof." >>> > }}} >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sprocklem >>> >> >> > >