Final vote counts are coming shortly, but Quazie's vote remained and became a PRESENT. Conditional votes are interpreted at the end of the voting period, so it wasn't a FOR at any point.
On 05/14/17 18:09, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 15:56 -0700, qoid.us (Agora's list server) wrote: >> Received: (qmail 13401 invoked from network); 7 May 2017 22:56:48 -0000 >> Received: from localhost (HELO vps.qoid.us) (127.0.0.1) >> by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 7 May 2017 22:56:48 -0000 >>> Return-Path: <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> >> Delivered-To: agn-agora-offic...@agoranomic.org >> Received: (qmail 13377 invoked from network); 7 May 2017 22:56:46 -0000 >> Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com (209.85.161.172) >> by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 7 May 2017 22:56:46 -0000 > In other words, the "voting period has started" message didn't actually > arrive at the lists until 22:56:46. > >> Received: (qmail 11287 invoked from network); 14 May 2017 22:56:19 -0000 >> Received: from localhost (HELO vps.qoid.us) (127.0.0.1) >> by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 14 May 2017 22:56:19 -0000 >>> Return-Path: <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >> Delivered-To: agn-agora-offic...@agoranomic.org >> Received: (qmail 11237 invoked from network); 14 May 2017 22:56:17 -0000 >> Received: from sun61.bham.ac.uk (147.188.128.150) >> by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 14 May 2017 22:56:17 -0000 > Here's part of the headers from the scam message to agora-official. As > we can see, it was definitely received inside the voting period. > > This is the latest of the four attempted scam messages (by me and > Aris). As such, I believe the correct vote tally on proposal 7850 is > most likely 1 FOR, 0 AGAINST, 0 PRESENT. (It's possible that Aris' > attempt to withdraw ballots on 7850 failed to withdraw Quazie's, which > was cast as "endorse ais523" not "FOR", which would make it 2 FOR, 2 > AGAINST, 0 PRESENT.) >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
