It looks like we're fixing it - but I'm fine letting the CFJS that
determine what has happened with my joining be judged by definitive players
so this bout of nonsense can end and the next one begin.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 16:41 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Well, that may be the problem we need to fix.
>
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 2:36 PM Sprocklem S <sprock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Aris Merchant
>>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Aris Merchant
>>> > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:00 PM Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> [...]
>>> >>
>>> > I found the way to withdraw my CFJ! As per Rule 2175, I retract the
>>> > CFJ I began above. In its place, I call a CFJ on the statement
>>> > "Assuming that Quazie is a player, e has, within the past week,
>>> > exceeded the Income Cap." I submit the same arguments as the above to
>>> > the new CFJ, along with the following addendum:
>>> >
>>> > Correction: When I said Budget Cap, I meant Income Cap.
>>> >
>>> > -Aris
>>>
>>> You seem to have forgotten barring Quazie this time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sprocklem
>>>
>>
>> Chances of me getting this CFJ are slim, as I only consented to judging
>> CFJs once my player state is finalized - Agora isn't quite active enough
>> for potentially non-player CFJ judges methinks.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to