I also wouldn't support punishment. During slow times I've published the registrar's report roughly monthly instead of weekly. It didn't make much difference because few things currently rely on the # of players. If I was punished for that, I'd probably have just vacated the seat. If there's someone else that wants it done more frequently they can (and should) deputize. If not, then me leaving the seat would just worsen the situation.
A lazy officer is better than no officer. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Maybe allow a status in which you become the provisional office and are > not payed, but also not fined. > > > On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> > Good point. I suggest that we also levy a fine. Maybe their officer >> > pay from all of the months in which they didn't report, with some form >> > of fine on top of that? >> >> Just as a note, I've been trying to give the Arbitor's job away for >> a year and only come back to it because no one else picks it up. >> Under those circumstances, I don't mind not getting a salary for not >> being timely, but if there was "a fine on top of that" I'd drop it >> entirely. >> >> If there was enough competition for jobs, this would be no issue, >> but there's no one competing for these jobs as it is. >> >> -G. >> >> >> >> > > -- > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >
