On 11/03/2016 11:20 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:55 PM nichdel <nich...@gmail.com
<mailto:nich...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 10/28/2016 11:18 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> ID Author(s) AI Title
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7820^! Alexis, ais523 1.0 Official Clarification
>
>
I vote AGAINST.Don't like the terms "substantially correct" or "minor
errors".
Why not?
-Alexis
If I published a weekly Registrar's Report that read, in full:
"The list of registered players includes nichdel."
It seems to me that that would be 'substantially correct' in that the
whole of it is factually correct. It also contains no errors at all.
The result is a situation where I can continue to do that until I'm
removed via election, since no one can deputise to fix the situation. If
the ADoP is complicit with this, that means up to 90 days of an
officeholder doing this before elections can begin.
I'm also working on a new, simpler version of the econ proposal that
would make holding offices more desirable, and this scam more dangerous.
