You mean it would never pass? It wasn't obvious to me. Anyhow one could always just declare someone speaker.
-Aris On Saturday, September 17, 2016, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:25 PM Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ > gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com');>> > wrote: > >> The first bit seems fine. The second bit though... Okay, I don't really >> know the precedent on this, but it seems like a fairly minor thing to have >> someone win over. I mean if someone fixes a game-braking error, or even a >> major one, that makes sense. But this doesn't even break anything. It just >> means that the election mechanics don't function quite as intended. >> >> -Aris >> > > Well yes, but winning is how you become Speaker. In any case the second > proposal is an obvious scam. > > -Alexis >
