> On Aug 2, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Luis Ressel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector > is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is > also a valid vote). > > ID Author(s) AI Title > -------------------------------------------------------------- > 7780+ the Warrigal 3.0 We don't need that SUPPORT. Adds an interesting new opportunity for office-holder scamming. > 7781+ the Warrigal 3.0 Secure, secures, securing, secured PRESENT. > 7782+ the Warrigal 3.0 Power Always Controls Mutability SUPPORT. > 7783+ scshunt 3.0 Flawless Consistency SUPPORT. Why not? > > > The proposal pool is currently empty. > > > Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending > <ID>+ : By publishing this report, I pend the marked proposal > > > The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 7780 > Title: We don't need that > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: the Warrigal > Co-author(s): > > Amend Rule 1551 "Ratification" to read: > > If an erroneous statement is made in an Agoran report, and the error > is not publicly noted within 30 days, and the erroneous statement is > consistent with the rest of the report, then the gamestate changes to > what it would be if the erroneous statement had been true at the time > of the report. > > Repeal Rule 2202 "Ratification Without Objection", Rule 2201 > "Self-Ratification", and Rule 2034 "Vote Protection and Cutoff for > Challenges". > > Amend Rule 2162 "Switches" by changing the words "a public document > purporting to be this portion of that officer's report is > self-ratifying, and implies that other instances are at their default > value" to "a public document purporting to be this portion of that > officer's report implies that other instances are at their default > value". > > Amend Rule 1607 "Distribution" by removing the sentence "This portion > of a public document purporting to be a Promotor's report is > self-ratifying." > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 7781 > Title: Secure, secures, securing, secured > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: the Warrigal > Co-author(s): > > In Rule 1688 "Power", change the phrase "A Rule that secures a change, > action, or value" to "A Rule that makes a change, action, or value > secured". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 7782 > Title: Power Always Controls Mutability > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: the Warrigal > Co-author(s): > > [Prevent any rule with power exactly 3 from somehow subverting the > power structure, because that would be really confusing.] > > In Rule 2140 "Power Controls Mutability", change the phrase "No entity > with power below the power of this rule" to "No entity with power less > than 3". Change the power of Rule 2140 to 3.1. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 7783 > Title: Flawless Consistency > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: scshunt > Co-author(s): > > Enact a new power-3.2 rule entitled "The Folly of Godel", reading "The > Agoran ruleset contains no contradictions or paradoxes." > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > -- > aranea
