On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:55 AM, omd <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, tmanthe2nd . <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Proposals 7773 and 7774 gives the wrong ID number for the rule it amends.
> >> Rule 2455 does not exist. So, the proposals don't actually do anything.
> >
> > So they do. Nice catch.
>
> Though if you ask me, the phrase 'Rule 2455 "How to Pend a Proposal"'
> is completely unambiguous. There's absolutely no reasonable doubt as
> to what the intended meaning of the phrase is, so the error
> constitutes "difference in spelling" which "does not create an
> ambiguity in meaning".
A CFJ found differently IIRC, but I think in that case the mis-numbering
referred accidentally to a different existing rule.
As Rulekeepor, I wholly disagree that this is a different in "spelling",
though it *may* still be clear enough depending what the precedent
says...
