On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >> ID: 7758 > >> *Unless* 50% or more of the valid ballots cast FOR this proposal were > >> submitted in messages containing the word "pseudo-acronym", do the > >> following: { > > This option was selected. > > > >> Change the title of Rule 2138 to "The Associate Director of > >> Personnel", and amend it to read: > > Retitled and amended. > > > >> Amend each rule containing the word "IADoP", in numerical order, by > >> replacing it with "ADoP". > > FAILED to amend (insufficient power) R1006 and R2154. There are no > > other instances of IADoP in the Ruleset. > > I believe this failure is in dispute, because it may have instead been > power 4, no?
I forgot this proposal was one of those. I agree this is in dispute. -G.
