On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Alex Smith
<callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> minor problems with the proposal (e.g. the way it defines a process that
> carries on over time is something that I'm not sure works under Agoran
> law, and potentially carries on after the repeal of the rule if it does;
> and the ). Also, we did something almost identical to this at BlogNomic

And the what else?

--the Warrigal

Reply via email to