On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Eritivus wrote: > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 02:24 +0000, Eritivus wrote: > > CFJ: The Promotor failed to perform a weekly duty during the week of > > 20 Oct. Deputisation to perform this duty is generally possible, > > given sufficient notice as per R2160(c), and given that the duty > > remains unperformed during the notice period. > > I retract this CFJ. I'm still interested in the answer, but it > doesn't need to be addressed now, since I'm abandoning my intent to > deputise.
Once again, I vaguely remember a past CFJ that asked how much of a report could be missing and still be a considered a report (with missing data) versus an entirely missing report. Well, that's not too helpful as I read it, remembering neither the context nor result.