On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Eritivus wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 02:24 +0000, Eritivus wrote:
> > CFJ: The Promotor failed to perform a weekly duty during the week of
> > 20 Oct. Deputisation to perform this duty is generally possible,
> > given sufficient notice as per R2160(c), and given that the duty
> > remains unperformed during the notice period.
> 
> I retract this CFJ. I'm still interested in the answer, but it
> doesn't need to be addressed now, since I'm abandoning my intent to
> deputise.
Once again, I vaguely remember a past CFJ that asked how much of
a report could be missing and still be a considered a report (with 
missing data) versus an entirely missing report.

Well, that's not too helpful as I read it, remembering neither the
context nor result.



Reply via email to