On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Tanner Swett <[email protected]> wrote: > Amend Rule 2160 "Deputisation" by appending the paragraph > > A rule which purports to allow a person to specially deputise > under particular circumstances thereby makes it POSSIBLE for the > person to do so
That's a weird formulation - a rule that says e CAN do it actually only means e CAN do it under certain conditions, and it's left implicit that special deputisation otherwise has the same effects as deputisation. Maybe reword?
