On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, omd wrote: > > Anyway, wrt the judgement itself, I continue to maintain that a > > process need not be precisely known in advance to be a process, and > > that there should be a strong bias against reading a broadly worded > > clause whose purpose is to ensure public review as applying to > > circumstances where public review was clearly not practically > > affected. Whatever...
Hi omd, a genuine question for you: Let's say that I was a player that hadn't posted for a couple weeks before your scam. Let's further say that, on Day 2, I post the following: "I noticed that omd just tried a long scam but I didn't have time to read the details. I'm not caught up with Agora and I'm traveling with poor access to email. I formally request 4 more days to review this proposed change." Should this lengthen the review to 6 days? -G.