On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, omd wrote:
> > Anyway, wrt the judgement itself, I continue to maintain that a
> > process need not be precisely known in advance to be a process, and
> > that there should be a strong bias against reading a broadly worded
> > clause whose purpose is to ensure public review as applying to
> > circumstances where public review was clearly not practically
> > affected.  Whatever...
Hi omd, a genuine question for you:

Let's say that I was a player that hadn't posted for a couple weeks
before your scam.

Let's further say that, on Day 2, I post the following:  "I noticed
that omd just tried a long scam but I didn't have time to read the
details.  I'm not caught up with Agora and I'm traveling with poor 
access to email.  I formally request 4 more days to review this 
proposed change."

Should this lengthen the review to 6 days?

-G.



Reply via email to