On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Edward Murphy wrote: > > CFJ 3415 (G.): "Henri has a Red Card." > > > > is hereby assigned to Murphy. > > > > > > CALLER'S ARGUMENTS > > > > Assets or other "item" rules don't currently exist. Henri was "issued" > > a Red Card and apologized. Was the red card destroyed? Was the implied > > metaphor of it being a real "card" give enough common definition space > > to make it a "thing" that must be destroyed, or is the only thing > > tracked the date of issuance? The referee is in charge of "keeping > > track of wrongdoing" but there's no guidance on what is supposed to be > > tracked. > > DISMISS as irrelevant, as there are currently no rules that depend on > the answer (at least none that explicitly mention Red Cards). If there > were, and the rules were still silent on the issue, then common sense / > best interests / etc. would depend on what those rules were.
Hrm, I called this CFJ because I came across a situation where it Currently Matters a couple weeks ago, but I'll be darned if I can remember what that situation was.
