On 30 June 2014 19:29, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > GRATUITOUS ARGUMENTS BY Tiger > > Nobody I know uses it like that. If someone > tells me at midnight tomorrow, I understand "tonight". If e actually > meant "tomorrow night at midnight", e should have clarified. Not that > I do much at midnight most days, but eh. > > More arguments: I think that if we're debating about whether it's 0:00 > or 24:00, it's not really well defined at all. "Should be considered > as 24:00"? Maybe. "Is defined as 24:00"? I don't think so. Maybe > there's a CfJ somewhere that could establish precedent, but my DB is > still offline and being at work I'd rather not start going through the > DB dump manually. > > Then again, here I am writing arguments for fun, so I guess that's not > much of an excuse. =P >
I don't recall writing this. As further proof that I did not, I have never had a "DB", and I could scarcely imagine stooping so low as to go through a "DB dump". (joking, but I'm serious in that they are someone else's gratuitous arguments) -Tiger
