On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:49 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, comex <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ugh. I have no idea what qmail is doing. Replying now in the >> off-chance it works after upgrading even more packages; otherwise I'll >> have to actually find the issue. > > So... to be more specific, when Googling the issue, a known qmail > issue with DNS responses over 512 bytes came up, but I thought it > wasn't that, because when attempting to do the resolution for > u.washington.edu I didn't get more than 512 bytes. But upon trying > again, I do indeed, so I guess there's some strange difference between > DNS servers and the bug is indeed that one. I think I just need to > apply the relevant qmail patches.
If I don't send another message, then this message successfully delivered to both players with the CNAME issue - you and x1122334455. For the record, I don't see how this could actually be related to the previous downtime, but perhaps I'm missing something (DNS caching?).
