On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote: > Rule 106: Adopting Proposals
I think, that the instant this one goes through, the proposal loses power and the rule changes after it stop (I could be wrong though). You actually might get into trouble even earlier, as for a while precedence between rules would cease to be defined, again possibly breaking the rest of the rule changes and leaving things in a broken state. And of course, since you repeal the judicial system entirely (I think? Did you leave any bits?) we wouldn't have a mechanism for sorting out the results. With a change of this magnitude, maybe you could post a proto- ruleset of where you hope things would end up (including what rules remain), then we could see if it makes logical sense as a whole, and figure out the technicality of getting there - perhaps by enacting the new things before repealing the old things; the old things would have precedence over the new things due to numerical order, than the old things could be repealed. -G.
