On Sun, 29 Dec 2013, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 15:29 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Repeal Rule 1586 (Definition and Continuity of Entities). > > [All of 1586 is common-sense legal precedent. Or not, let's see what > > happens.] > > Wouldn't doing this cause us to have no players and no fora the next > time the rules defining them (or switches) get amended, via Wooble's > reasoning?
Er, what was Wooble's reasoning? I looked at each clause and asked myself, "if this clause didn't exist, is it in the realm of what a judge using common sense would likely come up with for how entities continue?" and the answer IMO was "yes" for each clause... CMV?
