On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 22:20 -0500, omd wrote: > This can potentially make quorum negative; I guess this is not > inherently wrong, but it seems odd. Also likely to make scams easier > in some cases, which, it being you, I'm sure is purposeful...
I made a conscious decision not to think too much about the implications, in the belief that it would probably just lead to interesting CFJs. It shouldn't make scams easier unless there's widespread disinterest in a distribution. In fact, the rule would provide an incentive to vote (so as to prevent the following distribution being used for a voting scam). -- ais523
