On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Schultz < ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Benjamin Schultz < > ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:12 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Benjamin Schultz >>> <ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Part of the exercise is -- when was the last time Agora reenacted a >>> Rule? >>> >>> Might be Messy Statements. But note that >>> >>> The ID number of the new rule cannot >>> be specified by the enacting instrument; any attempt to so >>> specify is null and void. >>> >> >> Interesting. I'll work up an amendment to R591, just to enable >> reenactment. For a nomic should tolerate reenacting a repealed rule. >> >> -- >> OscarMeyr >> > > Oops. s/R591/R105 > > I was looking at the wrong search. > > -- > OscarMeyr > Proto-proposal Reenacting Rules: Power 3 Amend R105 by inserting the following after the paragraph labelled "(b)": (c) reenact a rule. A repealed rule identified by its most recent rule number may be reenacted with the same ID number and the next change identifier. If no text is specified, the rule is reenacted with the same text it had when it was most recently repealed. If the reenacting proposal provides new text for the rule, the rule must have materially the same purpose as did the repealed version; otherwise, the attempt to reenact the rule is null and void. [Reenact the rule, THEN change its purpose -- don't do both at once.] and renumbering the existing labels (c) through (e) accordingly. -- OscarMeyr
