FWIW, I did actually consider them. I didn't address them because a) they were only briefly alluded to and did not change my opinion, and b) I was typing this on my phone.
Is it necessary for a judge to address every argument in a case or only the ones they consider pertinent to their judgement? On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 29 Aug 2013, at 21:10, James Beirne <james.m.bei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I become active, make the following judgement, and then become inactive > again. > > > > --- > > > > In ruling on the case originally I probably put too much weight on the > opinions of a vocal few and misjudged Agoran tradition. > > > > I still feel Fool is guilty and deserving of a timeout, but I'll assign > a much shorter sentence. > > > > GUILTY/TIMEOUT 6 days > > I intend to appeal this with two support, because the judge has failed to > consider the arguments given by myself and various appellants regarding the > question of guilt. (I don't really blame em, it was nice enough to become > active to make the judgement.)
