On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Charles Walker <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 12 August 2013 21:44, Benjamin Schultz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Jonathan Rouillard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3365 > >> > >> ========================= Criminal Case 3365 ========================= > >> > >> scshunt has violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by > >> failing to publish the holder of each office, etc. last week. > >> > >> ======================================================================== > > > > > > > > DRAFT > > > > Based on the arguments from the Appeal Panel, I find it sufficient to > reduce > > the penalty to a loss of salary. Accordingly, I rule GUILTY / FINE 350 > > Yaks, that being the present amount of the IADoP's salary. > > Salaries are paid monthly, so you might want to look at something > closer to a quarter of that, depending on how many reports the > defendant missed. > Yes. I know they're paid monthly. :) -- OscarMeyr
