On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > ============================== CFJ 3386 ============================== > > Providing an audio version of the ruleset is a reasonable way to > allow vision-impaired persons to play.
Arguments: I don't think the word "reasonable" is clear enough to allow this CFJ to have a reasonable judgement. Are we asking whether or not, if someone created an audio version of the ruleset, then vision-impaired persons would reasonably be able to play it? Or, perhaps, whether or not, if there were a requirement to produce an audio version of the ruleset, then it would be considered a reasonable requirement for the purpose of judging culpability? —Machiavelli
