On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> I just remember the result, and that's how we've been playing in
> general (e.g. if I awarded a Herald award after a time limit,
> no one said it failed).  I don't remember logic or rules needed to
> back it up, so I don't know if that interpretation is still good
> (anyone remember the case?).
>
> -G.

Yes, and the deputization argument still holds true. Otherwise, many
actions would be un-deputizable.

-scshunt

Reply via email to