On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:57 PM, John Smith <spamba...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Did you miss the point of the arguments? > "no interpretation of Agoran law or > binding agreement may substantially limit" > => "interpretations of Agoran law or > binding agreement MAY NOT substantially limit" > => Substantially limiting is ILLEGAL > >
MMI doesn't apply since it's in lowercase. You're welcome to ask for reconsideration, in which I will explain in more detail why I agree with my initial judgment. -scshunt
