Let me stress that I'm talking hypothetically. Roujo never actually called for Judgement (wrong forum, hehe), and so did not actually commit the Crime. But I am interested to know what the Courts would consider a frivolous CFJ in the sense of the last paragraph of R869.
On 9 July 2013 09:26, Steven Gardner <steven.gard...@monash.edu> wrote: > On 9 July 2013 04:16, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > Don't think CFJ about a registration attempt to discussion list is >> frivolous though :P >> > > According to the OED, 'frivolous' has a special legal sense meaning > 'manifestly insufficient or futile'. Since it is well established in law > and precedent -- really, about as well established as anything can be in > Agora -- that messages sent to agora-discussion are ineffective, it seems > to me that further CFJs on the topic are superfluous, and indeed, futile. > > -- > Steve Gardner > Research Grants Development > Faculty of Business and Economics > Monash University, Caulfield campus > Rm: S8.04 | ph: (613) 9905 2486 > e: steven.gard...@monash.edu > *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on > alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). *** > > Two facts about lists: > (1) one can never remember the last item on any list; > (2) I can't remember what the other one is. > -- Steve Gardner Research Grants Development Faculty of Business and Economics Monash University, Caulfield campus Rm: S8.04 | ph: (613) 9905 2486 e: steven.gard...@monash.edu *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). *** Two facts about lists: (1) one can never remember the last item on any list; (2) I can't remember what the other one is.
