Yes, I believe that was the original intent of the rule, though not how it is written. Would support amendment.
Also, this may apply to me. Is there a chronological record of registrations/deregistrations/holds? - arkestra On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote: > > R2357: >> >> An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered >> continuously for at least 32 days, and also registered for at >> least 128 days total (not necessarily contiguously). >> >> I was registered continuously from 1 July 1994 until 19 June 2004. If I >> registered now, would I instantly be an Elder? I think I would be, as the >> Rule is written. If the Rule had meant to prevent this, it should have >> said >> ..."registered continuously for 32 days since eir most recent >> registration, >> etc." >> > > Hmmm... > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
