On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> Let the order of votes be known as a rank, such as the first person to
> have voted on a proposal be the Rank 1 voter, and so forth.
>
> For every vote I've made that I can change, I change it to ENDORSE X,
> where X is the player whose rank is the closest prime number to my
> own, picking the lowest rank in case of a tie.
>
> I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Causing the
> Assessor to panic violates eir R101 right to play. }
:) Our precedent on this kind of thing is that if an attempted action
would take "unreasonable effort" to decode, it's ambiguous and doesn't
do anything. (CFJ 1460 is a kind of cornerstone judgement here, the
example of the Riemann Hypothesis is a good one).
Of course figuring out whether something is "unreasonable effort" might
be subject to cfj...
-G.
