Got to wait 4 days... On Jul 3, 2013 9:56 PM, "Alex Smith" <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:50 +0100, Charles Walker wrote: > > On 3 July 2013 19:21, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> > wrote: > > >> 3343: FALSE > > >> > > >> If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act > on > > >> its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no > party's > > >> constitution currently does so. > > >> > > > > > > I intend to appeal this judgment with 2 support, as I think that this > > > fails to adequately address the complex and nuanced ISIDTID arguments, > > > and in particular the amount of authority that the ruleset gives to a > > > Party constitution beyond that given by the rules. > > > > I support. > > I support and do so. > > -- > ais523 > >
