On 28/06/2013 8:40 PM, Sgeo wrote:
I just noticed a contradiction in Ambassador Abuse's original rules, between 3 and 7.
(Rule 7 is more specific, supercedes.)
Ambassador Abuse does not, and never has had, a CfJ mechanism.
Players of AA must resolve their differences by consensus.
So, if Ambassador Abuse's contradiction affects Agora's gamestate, which it almost certainly does, what happens?
Players of AA haven't made a good faith attempt to resolve their differences. If they do, and still fail to come to agreement in a reasonable time, then Roujo will probably appoint me Ambassador Plenipotentiary to AA.
