I always obliviously rolled my eyes at it all.

Michael, Founding Member of the Incognoscenti

On 26/06/13 10:07, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 15:58 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
>>>> I have heard of the UNDEAD a few times before, but may I ask what it is?
>>>
>>> You can certainly ask, but if the above action was at all successful, I dare
>>> not say.
>>
>> Well, given that I have no particular UNDEAD ties,
> 
> It also included a clause that members should regularly deny any UNDEAD
> ties.  Or so it is rumored.
> 
>> Basically, a long time back (before the era when contracts dominated
>> gameplay, but when contract-like constructs nonetheless existed), a
>> group of Agorans decided to make an agreement/construct/similar binding
>> structure with, apparently the purpose of hiding its own details.
> 
> Rumor is that it was a full Nomic, that claimed to be an independent
> agreement from Agora (like Lindrum's aforementioned trading exchange).
> 
> It's possible that, at its inception, it was designed as a full-scale
> Nomic with win conditions, so that leaders/winners of the UNDEAD nomic 
> could compel other members' votes in other nomics, so winning the UNDEAD 
> nomic would lead to a strong position in multiple other nomics.  
> It's rumored that, from this independent agreement, UNDEAD members then 
> sought power in Agora by forming official Agoran "contract-like" 
> constructs (called Groups, simular to current Parties).  This is somewhat 
> different, legally, than if the UNDEAD had started out as a Group.
> 
> It's also rumored that while a bit of this gameplay lasted for a while,
> it served equally well as just a hatching ground for some nice schemes
> (whether or not the official UNDEAD mechanisms were used to compel
> members' participation in these schemes, scams were hatched).
> 
> The fact that it was known to exist, but secretive, generated a surprising 
> amount of paranoia in some non-member Agorans.  There were a couple genuine 
> witch hunts looking for members, for a short time Agora was genuinely like 
> a game of werewolf.  Rumor has it that members earned doubloons by gently 
> provoking paranoia and making posts of actions into the Agoran PF (some 
> fake, but some were real).  A genuine highlight was non-members genuinely 
> offering to "shelter" members who wanted to break away without facing 
> UNDEAD wrath.  It is rumored that at one point close to 50% of active Agora 
> were members, at least half never "revealed".  The player now known as 
> G. was an early reveal, so was able to be more overtly active in public 
> interactions.  Rumor also has it that a combination of fake and real 
> information is the UNDEAD modus operandi, up to and including this message.
> 
> The last "fully admitted" project that was definitely traced to the UNDEAD 
> was the Town Fountain.
> 
>> Apart from ehird, Agora mostly just left the UNDEAD alone.
> 
> It was the other way around.  So it is rumored.
> 
>> Eventually, it almost certainly disappeared as an Agoran legal construct 
>> with the repeal of contracts.
> 
> It is rumored that the real state of this subnomic was maintained for some 
> years past the repeal of Groups and the Fountain.  It was certainly never 
> formally dissolved.  As an independent contract, it's certainly arguable 
> whether it would (today) meet Zephram's definition of natural contract/
> partnership, and if so whether Agora could have any say over it.  It is 
> rumored that at least a few members have recently (within the last couple 
> months, including people not around at the time of the Fountain) asserted 
> in the right places that they are generally abiding by it.
> 
>> (Whether the other members of the UNDEAD would attempt to punish
>> them for doing so would, of course, be another matter.)
> 
> You might think so.  I couldn't possibly comment.
> 
> 
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to