Yeah, same idea. It's not valid to propose to amend something that isn't
a mutable rule. (Even if it might become mutable by enactment or
transmutation by the time the proposal is adopted).
-Dan
On 25/06/2013 7:36 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
By the same logic by which one cannot propose to amend a currently immutable
rule, even if there is a pending proposal to transmute it, I do not believe one
can propose to amend a rule which does not yet exist.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Ed Murphy
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:23 AM
To: Agora Nomic discussions (DF)
Subject: Re: DIS: Endgame XX
scshunt wrote:
I propose the following rule:
At 12:00 July 1 2013 UTC+1200, Agora XX ends and the player with the
most points wins the game. In the event of a tie, the tied player who
most recently had more points than each other tied player wins.
FOR.
I propose amending the rule created by the above-quoted proposal (assuming it
passes) by appending this text:
In the event that there is still no winner, Agora XX keeps going until there is
one.
