Voting on 326-329 has closed and voting on 330 closes in half an hour.
Full report at that time. Here I just number and repeat 11 new proposals.
-Dan
331 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 214 be amended to read:
>
> The Speaker shall choose Judges randomly from the set of qualified
> players. The players qualified to judge a statement are the Speaker
> and those Voters who voted on the rule change whose voting period most
> recently ended, except for the player who invoked judgement, and the
> player (if any) most recently selected as the statement's Judge.
>
> [Proposal comment: i.e. judges now selected from active players rather
> than always being the Speaker.]
332 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 302 be amended to read:
>
> When a proposal is adopted, each Voter who voted against it shall
> receive 5 points, and its author shall receive 10 points. When a
> proposal's voting period ends, each Voter who voted on it shall
> receive 5 points, unless they received points by this clause in the
> last 24 hours.
>
> [Proposal comment: Reward for voting.]
333 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 205 be amended to read:
>
> The Speaker shall make one proposal distribution per 24 hours,
> numbering and publishing the text of each proposal submitted since the
> last distribution. This starts each such proposal's prescribed voting
> period, which lasts 24 hours.
>
> [Proposal comment: Fewer distributions and overlapping voting periods
> = more votes?]
>
334 (omd):
> I propose that Rules 217 (game custom, spirit of the game) be made
immutable.
335 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 213 (judgements) be made immutable.
336 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 210 (timing of rule changes) be made immutable.
337 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 102 (initial mutability) be made mutable (because
> I would like to repeal it).
338 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 111 (conflict between mutable and immutable rules)
> be made mutable (ditto, I would like to make numerical precedence
> apply to all conflicts).
339 (omd):
> I propose that Rule 109 be made mutable (because I would like to make
> rule numbers stable rather than changing after every amendment).
340 (Steve):
> Enact a new Rule which reads:
>
> Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish
> the names and email addresses of all registered players of Agora XX.
341 (scshunt):
> I propose the following rule:
>
> At 12:00 July 1 2013 UTC+1200, Agora XX ends and the player with the
> most points wins the game. In the event of a tie, the tied player who
> most recently had more points than each other tied player wins.
