On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:13 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > I assume the defendant received the bounce message immediately after > attempting to post the ruleset, so e could have reasonably avoided > breaking the rule by various methods, such as splitting the ruleset > into parts or possibly posting a link to it along with its hash. > However, all of these workarounds are fairly annoying, so a light > punishment is appropriate. GUILTY/COMMUNITY SERVICE, destroy 1 VC (as > a R2354 cost for completing the task) within 1 month.
The rule breach seems extremely minor in my opinion, since the rules are kept up to date at https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_flr.txt anyway, and Rulekeepor woggle did in fact attempt to publish eir report. While publishing a message in multiple parts does indeed count as publishing the message (by CFJs 1451 and 1452), I don't think this method of publishing large messages is obvious. —Machiavelli
