On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Tanner Swett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Technically, there's no error, as I never said I was the CBG (except >> in the subject line, which doesn't count). > > There is, because your document purported to be a CBG report, and it > was not. So it would self-ratify even though it wasn't legally > published as a report.
Ah, that's true. Let me re-publish it. —Machiavelli
