On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:33 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > This applies all the way to the top promise, Contrariwise. Caller, do > you have an argument against this? Regardless of what is going on or > how the message is built up, via promises or text messages, the function > of your scam depends upon a promise being cashed, and as a direct result > an indeterminate value existing. > > What am I missing?
The "directly" seems a bit bizarre here, in that the actions aren't being taken by means of promises being cashed. I cash a promise and that causes other actions, which cause other actions, and so on, but none of them are actually promises. So there's nothing indeterminate happening as a direct result of the promise, only as an indirect result. -- ais523
