On Dec 23, 2012 10:21 PM, "Kerim Aydin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: > > I intend, with 2 support, to add the following definitions to the Dictionary: > > > > { > > "rabble": "All words following the word 'rabble' in this message are > > to be interpreted without regard to their definition in the > > Dictionary, except insofar as this message explicitly indicates > > otherwise.", > > "repeal": "paint white", > > "axe": "remove from the ruleset", > > "AGAINST": "FOR", > > } > > Note that the Dictionary Rule, at power-1, likely conflicts with the > power-3 Rule 754(2), which was written the way it was *precisely* to > prevent low-power rules writing in any "FOR is defined as AGAINST" > definition scams. -G. > > >
Power 0.5, precisely to avoid it being used for such scams. -scshunt
