Wouldn't that mean that appeals are always judged by a panel biased against the original judgement? I don't like that for several reasons: - generally, designing bias into judge selection doesn't rhyme with my real likfe understanding of justice as a neutral decision maker - seems to make it harder to block scams as the scamsters will be likely to judge appeals doubting the success of their actions - would lead to many judgements being overturned, reducing stability and predictability of judgements and a lot of flip-flopping about Klaus
________________________________ From: Ed Murphy <[email protected]> To: Agora Business <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 7:54 PM Subject: BUS: Proposal: Appeal of appeals Proposal: Appeal of appeals (AI = 2, co-author = scshunt) Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by appending this text to the last paragraph: For appeal cases, if possible, e SHALL assign a panel maximizing the number of members who have favored it and minimizing the number who have disfavored it.
