On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Pavitra wrote:
> >
> > Given that the intent is so obvious, it's more reasonable to parse it
> > as "all first-class players [each individually] have at least 14".
>
> There's still legitimate ambiguity regarding awarding props
> simultaneously/serially: if the prop holdings are {5, 10, 15} before the
> change, then afterward are they {14, 14, 15} or {14, 19, 24}?
>
Anyway, why are we penalizing/wiping out prop changes that occur in the
next couple weeks - they're valid, right? How about just "create 11 props
in the possession of each player" (guessing at three weeks passing).
