oops, yes I meant 3218.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, FKA441344 <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:17 PM, FKA441344 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I intend to, without objection, make case 3128 notable and suggest >>> that the annotation for it be added to rule 2365 >> Without Objection I do so. > > Now that I've looked at this, ITYM 3218 - 3128 was about criminal > cases, not pool fees, although there was an intent to make it Notable > when it was called. > > I intend, without objection, to make CFJ 3218 Notable.
