On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Ozymandias Haynes <ozymandias.hay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Also, TRUE is an incorrect judgement, because you have not won the >> game, regardless of what the judgement says. If I CFJ'd "I have won >> the game in 2012." and it was judged TRUE, that would be an incorrect >> judgement; judgements can interpret the rules, but not override them. > > I don't think this CFJ alone would constitute a win, but I could > submit a distinct claim of victory and in the case of a TRUE or FALSE > judgment here, cite the CFJ as evidence. No?
Probably not. You'd have to cause a paradox, and *only then* call a CFJ on that paradox. The CFJ can't be involved in the paradox, it only serves to confirm that the paradox exists. ~ Roujo
