On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Arguments: The "usual CFJ", despite being established in game custom, > doesn't have a standard phrasing, although there are some common ones. > ("I am a player" or "Phlogistique is a player" are two plausible > wordings.) I'd say that the meaning of the statement of the CFJ is > unambiguous, but the exact statement of the phrasing is ambiguous. Does > that matter?
I would have thought that the specific wording of the CFJ created by my message would be "Also, the usual CFJ." (Not sure if and how that relates to your point.) -- Noé Rubinstein