ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 18:42 +0100, FKA441344 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Sean Hunt<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, FKA441344<[email protected]> wrote:
*scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
ASAP after it was assigned to em.
Evidence: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3218
Arguments: It wasn't me, boss!
-scshunt
Oops. If possible I retract this case. I initiate a criminal case:
ais523 violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
ASAP after it was assigned to em.
Arguments: It wasn't originally clear whether the case existed, or who
it had been assigned to. (In fact, I suspect it may /still/ be assigned
to FKA441344.)
Granted on "whether the case existed", but I don't follow how it would
have existed and been assigned to someone else (especially FKA441344,
who initiated it).
