On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Pavitra <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/28/2012 09:29 PM, omd wrote: >>>> 7246 3 omd Adoption reassociation >>> AGAINST >> >> Why? > > Because it looks like a trivial rewording to no effect, which makes me > suspect a scam.
Sorry, I should have added a comment, but it's based on http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg23405.html - the existing ruleset seems to nowhere state that proposals are adopted when the corresponding decisions are resolved, rather than at the end of their voting periods.
